WIP Think · Session one

What is AI for, and who is it for?

A small reading and discussion group for the bigger questions AI raises. No technical expertise needed, just curiosity and a willingness to hear different views.

When Thursday 12 November, 6:30pm
Where Singapore Revealed when you book
Seat S$10 Holds your seat, dinner at your own expense
Book on Luma →

About WIP Think

WIP Think is a space to step away from the latest tools and product announcements, and spend some time on the bigger questions AI raises for our work, our lives and our relationships.

There won't be a presentation or a technical test. We'll start with a short introduction, then open up the conversation. You don't need to be an AI expert, or to have a position worked out before you arrive. Bring your questions, your perspective and a willingness to hear different views.

Our first discussion

What is AI for, and who is it for?

As AI becomes more capable, what should its relationship with humans be?

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman argues that AI should remain under human control and ultimately serve human interests. Anthropic's approach to Claude raises a different question. It doesn't claim that Claude is conscious or has rights, but its Constitution describes Claude's moral status as uncertain, and considers whether future AI systems could have experiences or interests deserving of moral consideration.

That gives us plenty to talk about.

Should AI always remain a tool serving human purposes? And what happens if we begin to question whether it's just a tool?

Questions we'll explore

You don't need to prepare answers to all of these. They're here to give you a sense of where the conversation might go.

  1. What is AI for? Should its purpose ultimately be to serve humans?
  2. Should AI always be under human control? What does that mean if we also expect AI to make judgments and sometimes refuse us?
  3. Should we design AI to seem more human? Does giving AI a personality, values and apparent preferences make it easier for us to interact with and control, or make us too likely to treat it as human?
  4. What if AI starts to seem like more than a tool? If it appears to have feelings, preferences or interests, should that affect how we treat it, even if we don't know whether those experiences are real?
  5. What would change if we decided AI deserves some moral consideration? Could we still own it, make it work, modify it, or switch it off?
  6. Who should make these decisions? The companies building AI? Scientists? Governments? Society more broadly?

A few things to read and watch

We've gathered some material to introduce the different perspectives. You don't need to read every document from beginning to end.

If you'd like to go deeper: Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 system card includes its model-welfare research.

Thursday 12 November, 6:30pm

S$10 holds your seat, and dinner is at your own expense. Small room, so the seats go quickly.

Book on Luma →
← All three ways in